Tarapaca and Antofagasta disputes and the Bolivian claim on the Antofagasta border of Chile.


Historical context:
Since the end of the Pacific War between Chile, Bolivia and Peru; political claims about the territory between Tacna and Antofagasta has been made by Peru and Bolivia. Peru claims about sovereign over the Tacna border, which was conceded in 1929, were sanctioned in the Lima Treaty between Chile and Peru, leaving the land locked situation of Bolivia denied because Chile wasn't going to negotiate about territories that in the past were possessions of the Peruvian State.

Actual context:
In this moment, there's a trial between Chile and Bolivia about the obligation of Chile to negotiate a solution to the land lock situation of Bolivia. The trial is going to be executed in the International Court of Justice of The Hague in Nederland. The verdict will be exposed to the public today, first of October of 2018.

Possible solution:
There're two possible solutions. First of all, the judges could recognize the obligation of Chile to negotiate a solution to Bolivia's land lock or, in second place, deny the Bolivian's allegations on the obligation to negotiate about the Antofagasta and Tarapaca border from Chile, ruining the historical pretension of Bolivia having sovereign over a portion of the Pacific Ocean of the Bolivian President Evo Morales.

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Comrade Joaquinov Lavinovsky, Supreme Commander of the Soviet of Lascondesgrado

I don't know what to do or i don't know how to do it?

IMPACTOOO!! PRIMER PLANO!! POLEMIC QUESTIONS ABOUT THINGS xd